Is defining collaboration useful
OK so you may be able to define collaboration, but will it help you achieve it?
Wikipedia makes an attempt at defining “Collaboration” which it offers with a 'health warning' - The factual accuracy of this article is disputed.
Collaboration comes from the Latin 'co' meaning 'with' and 'labore' meaning 'to work' and means 'to work together'.
However wikipedia neatly sidesteps the question by suggesting that more research is required to answer questions like:
- How does collaboration differ from cooperation?
- What qualifies as a collaboration?
- What are the defining principles or elements of this process?
One of the barriers to collaboration is the very word itself - in many places, such as France, the UK and Ireland, the word is loaded with negativity from its wartime meaning of "traitorous cooperation with the enemy".
So it seems to me that a definitional approach to collaboration is unlikely to help us much in trying to produce good collaboration in our teams.
It is sometimes easier to see the symptoms of collaboration
Another approach is to try and understand collaboration by looking at contrasts in a number of domains:
At one end of the spectrum how do things look if collaboration is absent?
And at the opposite end of the spectrum how does the situation look if collaboration is present?
- Developing Documents
Absent: Solo with collaboration on review
Present: Group scoping and development
- New Ideas & Innovation
Absent: Linear and Incremental approach
Present: Non-linear and Quantum
- Conflict Resolution
Absent: Formal, slow and late to be spotted
Present: Informal, fast and raised early
- Problem Solving
Absent: Symptoms only addressed for quick resolution
Present: Causes examined even if disruptive
- Conversations and Communication
Absent: Non-disclosive and safe
Present: Disclosive but risky and messy
- Opportunities and Business Development
Absent: Narrow focus/ direct-interest only
Present: Broad focus / mutual reciprocity
If you assign numeric scores to each of these six domains you can easily create a quick 'collaboration signature' for your team.
So perhaps it may be better not to try and define collaboration but to ask yourself to what extent you see evidence of its fruits in these (and other) domains of your team's operation.
Bioteams Books Reviews
Read this book if your future is anyway connected to Web2.0. Andrew Keen’s central thesis is that if all content (e.g. music, video, news, books, encyclopaedias) is produced by “amateurs” and no-one will pay for “professional” versions then its curtains for quality or independent publishing.