Is defining collaboration useful
Stumble It!OK so you may be able to define collaboration, but will it help you achieve it?
Wikipedia makes an attempt at defining “Collaboration” which it offers with a 'health warning' - The factual accuracy of this article is disputed.
Collaboration comes from the Latin 'co' meaning 'with' and 'labore' meaning 'to work' and means 'to work together'.
However wikipedia neatly sidesteps the question by suggesting that more research is required to answer questions like:
- How does collaboration differ from cooperation?
- What qualifies as a collaboration?
- What are the defining principles or elements of this process?
One of the barriers to collaboration is the very word itself - in many places, such as France, the UK and Ireland, the word is loaded with negativity from its wartime meaning of "traitorous cooperation with the enemy".
So it seems to me that a definitional approach to collaboration is unlikely to help us much in trying to produce good collaboration in our teams.
It is sometimes easier to see the symptoms of collaboration
Another approach is to try and understand collaboration by looking at contrasts in a number of domains:
At one end of the spectrum how do things look if collaboration is absent?
And at the opposite end of the spectrum how does the situation look if collaboration is present?
- Developing Documents
Absent: Solo with collaboration on review
Present: Group scoping and development - New Ideas & Innovation
Absent: Linear and Incremental approach
Present: Non-linear and Quantum - Conflict Resolution
Absent: Formal, slow and late to be spotted
Present: Informal, fast and raised early - Problem Solving
Absent: Symptoms only addressed for quick resolution
Present: Causes examined even if disruptive - Conversations and Communication
Absent: Non-disclosive and safe
Present: Disclosive but risky and messy - Opportunities and Business Development
Absent: Narrow focus/ direct-interest only
Present: Broad focus / mutual reciprocity
If you assign numeric scores to each of these six domains you can easily create a quick 'collaboration signature' for your team.
So perhaps it may be better not to try and define collaboration but to ask yourself to what extent you see evidence of its fruits in these (and other) domains of your team's operation.
Tags: collaboration
Digg | 
del.icio.us | 
Reddit | 
Yahoo! | 
Add to my favourites
Bioteams Books Reviews
When not to collaborate
A team of one is sometimes best. It might sound like heresy but sometimes the most effective way to produce something is not through collaboration. Collaboration is best for tasks which cannot be fully achieved by a single person – if a job can be completed best by one person then to collaborate to do it will only make it worse.
Buy it now from:
Amazon.Com
Amazon.Co.UK
Related Team Leadership Development Articles
Seven tips for a perfect team meeting
Operational meetings are the engine of organisational and project governance however often their success is left totally to chance. Heres my 7 tips for making them more effective
Virtual team simulator helps leaders
Leading a virtual team requires different skills than leading a traditional team. For example many virtual team and virtual network outcomes are counter-intuitive due to the complex living nature of the team itself. Discovering this 'on the job' is as crazy as training airline pilots without using flight simulators! This article describes a research project which developed a PC-based simulator tool to help virtual team leaders experience decision making in various scenarios.
The 3 rings of commitment in any group
Managing any team, network or group becomes a whole lot easier if you understand the distinction of the three concentric rings of team member commitment.
Leave a comment