Virtual team member autonomy: learn from software agents
Team leaders who want their team members to show more initiative and take greater responsibility can learn from the principles of autonomous software agents so I am delighted to republish a bioteams guest essay on “Agents: Technology and Usage” by James Odell which is attached in full as a pdf.
Above Image "Robots forming a line with distributed behaviour" is from the I-Swarm project and is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivs 2.0:
James was an early innovator of Information Engineering methodologies and more recently has been working with the OMG (Object Management Group) where he co-chaired their Agents Work Group. He also worked extensively in the area of agent-based communication methods many of which are based on the messaging techniques of the social insects.
One of the central tenets of bioteams is to encourage team members to seek the many benefits of operating as responsible but autonomous team players.
This is the style of natures' best teams where rather than receiving direction through command and control leadership structures the members operate to varying degrees as self-managed agents.
One of the areas which has had the biggest success in applying biological principles is Distributed Computing where the concept of an ”agent” is a key element.
An agent can be a person, machine or a piece of software and is simply defined as “one who acts”.
In previous articles I speculated on the most useful traits for bioteam members.
I believe James’ article is particularly useful in this context as it not only clarifies the agent concept but also shows how software agents communicate and interact with each other and their environments in real life applications.
The paper also defines some of the most important properties of agents such as:
- Autonomous
- Interactive
- Adaptive
- Sociable
- Mobile
- Proxy
- Proactive
- Intelligent
- Rational
- Unpredictable
- Credible
- Transparent
- Cooperative
- Competitive
- Rugged
- Trustworthy
Many if not all of these characteristics can be applied equally well to high-performing human teams.
Tags: agents, self-managed teams
Digg | 
del.icio.us | 
Reddit | 
Yahoo! | 
Add to my favourites
2 Comments | Leave a comment
Leave a comment
Bioteams Books Reviews
Leadership and Self-Deception
A few months ago I read the book "Leadership and Self-Deception". Then I became a friend of the Arbinger Institute, went through some training with them in London and may be involved with them in the future. So I suppose the book inspired me – here’s why! Guest book review by Mario Gastaldi.
Buy it now from:
Amazon.Com
Amazon.Co.UK
Related Bioteams Features Articles
Natures four teamwork systems
What is Teamwork? Although there are many different definitions, in nature the definition of 'teamwork' is very precise. There are four different types of "teamwork" in biological teams: Solowork, Crowdwork, Groupwork and Teamwork itself. A bioteam knows how and when to use all four forms - the choice depends on the specific task at hand.
The 7 Secrets of High-Performing Teams: New Bioteams Video
Design better social software using Living Systems Theory
With the explosion in social software and the recognition that these types of systems need to reach critical mass to survive and prosper it is amazing that so few people seem to be applying the well-established philosophical principles of living systems (autopoiesis) to design for sustainability.
I think its important to be both autonomous and get a bit of directions. Individuals working from their virtual offices around the world require effective leadership and management for them to work efficiently as a team even though they might be efficient by themselves.
Hi John - thanks for an important comment - KEN