Group collaboration: lessons from conflict resolution
Stumble It!Some of the approaches applied to conflict resolution apply equally well to the development of on-line and virtual communities, teams and networks. One of the most interesting is "The Flight of the Flamingos" scenario.
The end of apartheid in South Africa
In 1992 four scenarios were developed collaboratively by 22 prominent South Africans [1] from across the ideological spectrum to capture a ten-year vision about where South Africa might end up:
- Ostrich (continuation of apartheid)
- Lame Duck (constitutionally weakened government leading to slow and indecisive transition)
- Icarus (rapid introduction of populist but unsustainable economic policies followed by economic crash)
- Flight of the Flamingos (sustainable government policies leading to inclusive growth and democracy)
The last scenario was, of course, in the end largely achieved where like the graceful birds taking off from a lake “every one in society rises slowly and steadily together”.
However the other scenarios were all entirely possible outcomes which needed to be identified and somehow mitigated against.
Virtual community development scenarios
These four scenarios are equally relevant to those of us trying to mobilise, nurture or incubate virtual communities which are able to sustain themselves beyond an initial enthusiasm or novelty stage.
The failures and scenarios often follow a similar sequence in our virtual community-building initiatives:
Mistake#1: We don’t take time to involve people properly……
Outcome#1: Ostrich - head in the sand - and everybody ignores it
Mistake#2: We take too long and don’t create enough urgency or quick wins.
Outcome#2: Lame Duck - limps along - only the leaders use it!
Mistake#3: We are too ambitious and over-sell it…..
Outcome#3: Icarus - great start but soon crashes and burns
If we are humble enough to learn from these majestic birds and incorporate natures teaming principles in our approach to virtual collaboration then we have an excellent chance of a “Flight of the flamingos” with everybody in the virtual community rising up slowly and steadily together.
References
1. Chrislip, D., 2003. The Collaborative Leadership Fieldbook - A guide for citizens and civic leaders, Jossey Bass pp. 200-202
Tags: community, conflict resolution, flamingos
Digg | 
del.icio.us | 
Reddit | 
Yahoo! | 
Add to my favourites
1 Comment | Leave a comment
Leave a comment
Bioteams Books Reviews
When collaboration goes bad
Poor organisational intelligence leads to 'coblaboration' instead of collaboration.Harvard Professor, David Perkins, in his latest book, "King Arthur's Round Table : How Collaborative Conversations Create Smart Organizations", discusses the importance of "organisational Intelligence" and "developmental leadership" and how the absence of these leads to coblaboration rather than collaboration in organisational teams.
Buy it now from:
Amazon.Com
Amazon.Co.UK
Related Virtual Teams Articles
Capable or popular: which would you rather be
Research published in the Harvard Business Review , Competent Jerks, Lovable Fools and the formation of social networks, (June 2005) shows that when people need help getting a job done, they will usually choose a congenial colleague over a more capable one.
New Version of Bioteams Audio Presentation
Virtual Teams Can Thrive Without Adding New Technology - Audio-Visual Presentation Showcases How
Just in case you missed it my esteemed colleague Robin Good and I have now produced a new version of my first bioteams audio presentation.
Practical issues and lessons for effective virtual teams
Virtual Collaboration – dispatches from the front line
Bioteam's Guest Article by Charlie Bess
While I am sure that nobody "sets out" to be a lame duck, or icarus, what people may need are "signs/symbolic actions" that denote a direction is being enacted. i.e. I think I am gathering consensus, seeking assumptions, but what I am actually doing in practice is communicating my vision. What might therefore be useful is a post on "if you've been in a meeting and have heard these phrases"; "here is how to parse a conversational strucure after a meeting to unearth unchallenged assumptions", etc. etc. Tall ask! I know a company that put an organisational phychologist and conversational analyst into a top team meeting to evaluate how comprehensively they were speaking about their subjects, how well conflicts were handled etc. The end result? they wanted that analyst to work with them full time because sometimes the elephant in the room is the way we talk around here"!