Group Messaging Instincts: how to recover them
Stumble It!Biological teams make extensive use of short messages as their main means of communication: Ants use chemical messages, Bees use visual messages conveyed through dance and Dolphins use sonar, however most human teams seem to have forgotten their Messaging Instincts.
The Messaging Instinct
I call this natural method of communications The Messaging Instinct.
When you analyse these types of message-based communications further you quickly notice that across species and communications media the underlying systems all share certain common characteristics:
- Peer systems - Every one in the group or team communicates like this - not just the leaders or elders
- The messages are sent and instantly received ‘in situ’ – in other words the messages come from and go to wherever the other members of the group happen to be – they are not stored for processing later
- They are predominantly ‘one to many’ broadcast messages (‘shouts’) with some ‘one to one’ messages (‘whispers’) but not much ‘one to some’ messages (‘gossips’) - See Team communication patterns: key lessons from nature for more
- They often only use one-way messages – the receiver can take action (or not) without having to reply first – this makes it incredibly fast and responsive
Have Human groups lost The Messaging Instinct?
I contend that human groups, possibly because we are so advanced at complex and long conversations have largely forgotten their Messaging Instincts.
Human electronic communications today, with the exception of young people, is based more on documents than messages.
What do I mean by document-based communications: essentially email /attachments being exchanged electronically.
Just to clarify the difference between a message and a document:
a message is a simple single topic communications signal which may or may not merit a response signal
a document is a complex multi-message communication transaction each component of which may require further complex communications
Learning from the Short Message Generation
The Messaging Instinct might have been lost to humankind forever (and never even noticed that it had been lost) had today's younger generation not stumbled into the SMS (Short Message Service) and IM (Instant Message) phenomena on their mobile phones and computers.
So one of the central foundations of bioteaming is helping human teams, social groups and business networks recover their lost Messaging Instincts.
And the technology change which now enables this: Short Messaging, Instant Messaging and presence technologies– digital pheromones for humans!
For more on bioteaming see The Bioteaming Manifesto.
Digg | 
del.icio.us | 
Reddit | 
Yahoo! | 
Add to my favourites
Comments
Bioteams Books Reviews
Seven team decision-making methods
The way a team decides to decide is one of the most important decisions it makes. In the excellent book, “Why Teams Don’t Work” the authors, Harvey Robbins and Michael Finley, identify seven key decision-making methods for teams.
Buy it now from:
Amazon.Com
Amazon.Co.UK
Related Bioteams Features Articles
Bioteaming is biomimicry of social structures
Janine Benyus, talking at TED, describes biomimicry as learning an idea from an organism and then applying it - the conscious emulation of life's genius. Bioteaming, then, is the biomimicry of social structures- taking ideas from Nature about how groups perform and intra-operate, and applying them to enhance how we humans work together in groups and teams. Doug Philips aka teamite#222* and bioteams guest author muses.
Video: How do ants know what to do?
Armed with a few students, a backhoe and a handful of markers, Deborah Gordon digs up ant colonies in the Arizona desert. She asks: How do these chitinous creatures get down to business and even multitask when they need to with no language, memory or visible leadership?
Small Team Collaboration: Seven Key Beliefs To Work As A Great Team
What makes great teams such? Is it just a coincidence that some teams consistently outperform others or is being a high performing team due to specific traits of those who make the team up? Robin Good and Ken Thompson suggest the team's beliefs are the key.
