A philosophy of change management
When an organisation or team or network seeks to bring about any form of change they require and expect the individuals affected to behave differently in some way. Peter Fryer describes his philosophy of small changes.
Usually change involves :
- carrying out new processes
- conducting existing processes differently
- relating to others in different ways
- acting on their own initiative more
- or many others
Most change is a threat not an opportunity
However, because most people tie up their identity with what they do, many changes are resisted if they are perceived to threaten their identity. Also people behave in accordance with how they see the world, which is based on their experiences, skills, beliefs and values etc., and therefore any required change must be in accord with this world view if it is to be sustained.
Three principles of change
Therefore I believe that change facilitation should be based on three principles, that:
1. Changes must be small enough to be accommodated and owned by the individuals concerned so as not to threaten their identity. Therefore, it is better to make several small changes over a period of time rather than a single big change.
2. Most successful change is iterative and many small changes can have large effects especially after going around the organisational system a few times. The trick is to help the organisation identify these key small changes (i.e. trojanmice).
3. If people are to behave differently they need to view their world differently. This firstly requires that they appreciate there many different ways of viewing things and secondly they acquire the skills to do so. When we see things differently we invariably behave differently.
For more details see Peter's article on An organisation case study in complex adaptive systems.. Peter can be reached via Trojanmice
Bioteams Books Reviews
We are bombarded with the idea its good to talk and its good to text. But is texting and other forms of mobile phone interaction a useful form of communication? Or is it even a form of communication at all or something totally different? In a mini-book "Heidegger, Habermas and the mobile phone" the author invokes some key thinkers of the twentieth century to offer an essential alternative to the new doctrine of 'm-communication': Martin Heidegger, who saw humanity as ‘the entity which talks’ and Jürgen Habermas, current-day advocate of authentic communication.