Virtual software development services: a review
Stumble It!In a previous article, Avoiding remote software collaboration disasters, I shared my mixed experiences of virtual software development and offered four golden rules I now use. I mentioned elance but have now also been favourably impressed with another service, Rentacoder, which allows you to post projects to be bid for by software contractors all over the world.
Spam Bidders
What I particularly like about Rentacoder is the quality of responses and questions I received from the bidding suppliers in the areas I was looking for work (J2ME).
In other services I have used you may get more responses than Rentacoder, however this is partly due to suppliers who just send you an automatic reply expressing interest without even reading your requirement. Amazingly some even agree with your budget and timeframes!
I prefer less responses of better quality than lots of speculative responses and Rentacoder looks good here. A simple way to eliminate these Spam Bidders is to mention your project name somewhere in the middle of the brief you post and to automatically eliminate any bidder who does not mention it in their reply.
Escrow Account
The other thing I like about Rentacoder is that, once you select your coder you transfer the project amount (full or part depending on size of project) into a Rentacoder escrow account.
You then only release this when you are happy with project completion. That arrangement pretty seems fair to me for both customer and supplier.
Rentacoder also suggests a standard set of terms for your project which you can accept or modify.
Great for niche work
My observation is that this is an excellent way to get niche or specialised items delivered very competitively. If you post a niche project you may get no response or you may get some excellent responses. In the latter case the bids may be so competitive it could only be that the guys have done jobs very similar before and are using this work as their starting point.
It is of course even better if you can produce a really tight specification with no ambiguity.
I would be more hesitant about using these kinds of services for more general development work and any work which requires considerable design.
Don’t be naïve
Like all services you need to filter the replies to find the best ones. In addition to the points I mentioned in the previous article I also place a lot of weight on:
- The quality of the supplier’s clarification questions
- How well they write in my first language (English in my case)
- Their digital reputations (available on the system)
You also get some very enthusiastic and confident replies but I don’t think this is a criteria you should place much weight on!
Virtual Professional Communities for Software
It seems to me that services like elance and Rentacoder are nurturing Virtual Professional Communities for Software which could become the dominant way software is delivered in the future.
Its very different from outsourcing as it is not about contracting whole projects but being able to use remote niche developers for specialised tasks and deliverables within a project. It is therefore an on-going collaboration between the in-house project team and the external resources.
This is the kind of mixed distributed multi-organisational team for whom the bioteaming approach is ideal.
Enterprises, be they IT user or software supplier, not experimenting and integrating this way of working into their operations may find themselves rendered uncompetitive much sooner than they think
Digg | 
del.icio.us | 
Reddit | 
Yahoo! | 
Add to my favourites
Comments
It is fair to warn about the pitfalls of rentacoder.
RECOMMENDATION: if someone tries to make serious project he will stumble in the incredible stupidity of rac staff. People interested to make serious projects have to go far away from rentacoder.
URL: http://kamen123.blogspot.com/2007/03/very-funny-link-that-i-found.html
TASK TITLE: outline major mistakes of rentacoder staff during years
ACHIEVED GOAL: created perfect evidence
EVIDENCE OF: the dummies in rentacoder staff do not understand more than several words plain English and they are proficient to blame someone else
BRIEF DESCRIPTION: the dummies in rentacoder staff can not understand the PERFECT documentation of IIS/ASP during years. And they blame Microsoft. But the real problem is the endless stupidity of rentacoder staff
SIDE EFFECT: this task proves that I have much more skills and experience than the liars in rentacoder staff
Posted by: kamen 123 | August 23, 2007 11:05 AM
The insulter "kamen123" has been banned from RentACoder:
http://www.rentacoder.com/RentACoder/misc/ArbitrationInfo/KamenKaburov/RentACoderArbitration/KamenKaburov_RentACoder_Arbitration.htm
Main reason: "He insulted other parties numerous times".
"kamen 123" spoil perfect site in revenge.
Posted by: Sergey I.Grachyov | September 1, 2007 7:59 PM
Bioteams Books Reviews
What teams can learn from wolves
If you think that there is not much human teams can learn from nature think again! Temple Grandin in her amazing book Animals in Translation: Using the Mysteries of Autism to Decode Animal Behavior (p303-307) puts forward the incredible theory that early humans only became today’s successful homo sapiens because they learned to act and think like the wolves they co-habited with.
Buy it now from:
Amazon.Com
Amazon.Co.UK
Related Virtual Software Development Articles
Can software engineering teams adapt biological principles
Ken Thompson, facilitated an interactive session at the 2006 SPICE Conference in Luxembourg in June 2006 with the leading practitioners and researchers in Software Process Improvement (SPI) on the topic 'Can software engineering teams adapt biological principles?'
Can software engineering teams adapt biological principles?
Ken Thompson, speaking at the 2006 SPICE Conference in Luxembourg (May 5) has facilitated an interactive session with leading practitioners and researchers in the field of Software Process Improvement (SPI) on this challenging question.
What good and bad software teams believe differently
Previously I have discussed The beliefs of High Performing Teams (HPTs) and shared the results of a research project on the beliefs of HPTs in a major software organisation. I now invite the SPICE2006 participants and other software engineers to participate in the next stage of this research.
