The 3 rings of member commitment in any dynamic group
Stumble It!Managing any team, network or group becomes a whole lot simpler if you understand the three rings of member commitment.
I define the three rings as the Inner Ring, Middle Ring and Outer Ring.
For something so fundamental I was amazed to find there seems to be very little written about it - the only reference I could find to anything vaguely similar is in "Mastering Virtual Teams " [1].
The 3 rings
Essentially the group leader(s) and each group member should make a joint decision on which one of the three concentric rings of commitment they belong in (at that point in time):
- The Inner Ring
This is where the leaders and most committed group members reside.
This is also referred to as the Core Team where the members are "accountable for direct task output". - The Middle Ring
This is where the normal active team members reside.
This is also called this the Extended Team where there is not necessarily daily involvement from the members. - The Outer Ring
This is where the team members who make occasional input reside.
This is also known as the Ancilliary Team whose role include adhoc expertise, reviewing and approving work.
Using the 3 rings
The three rings of groups make it very easy to discuss with team members, in simple terms, where everyone sits in terms of their commitment to the team.
It also works very well with collaborative business networks where team commitment is often the number one problem.
For each ring of the group you just have to agree with its members:
- Types of communication
- Reply and response times
- Hours per week
- Involvement etc
You need all 3 rings!
Finally don't fall into the trap of thinking that Ring 3 members are less valuable that Ring 1 or Ring 2 members.
You need all three rings operating well in a successful team or network.
Ring 3 members can be absolutely crucial in areas such as authority, approvals, organisational grapevines and politics.
References
1. "Mastering Virtual Teams " by Deborah Duarte and Nancy Tennant Snyder" and published by Jossey-Bass.
Tags: rings
Digg | 
del.icio.us | 
Reddit | 
Yahoo! | 
Add to my favourites
Comments
I am indeed grateful! It made my class thinking of their commitment to each other as a team.
Posted by: yosefina gloria | April 21, 2008 12:34 AM
Hi Yosefina
I am glad you found it helpful
Best Regards
Ken
Posted by: Ken Thompson | April 21, 2008 8:25 AM
Bioteams Books Reviews
When not to collaborate
A team of one is sometimes best. It might sound like heresy but sometimes the most effective way to produce something is not through collaboration. Collaboration is best for tasks which cannot be fully achieved by a single person – if a job can be completed best by one person then to collaborate to do it will only make it worse.
Buy it now from:
Amazon.Com
Amazon.Co.UK
Related Online Collaboration Techniques Articles
The Virtual Team Profiler: the fastest way to find out what your virtual team needs
A virtual team profiling technique to help you spot problems before they turn into nasty surprises by first exposing the nature of the team in 8 key dimensions: Team Objectives, Leadership Style, Member Profiles, Team Shape, Environment, Working Approach, Social Dynamic and Technology.
Five tips for a perfect meeting
Good operational meetings, whether co-located or virtual, are the engine of organisational and project governance. However often their success is left totally to chance. Here are my five key tips for making them more effective:
Conference Calls: Twelve Golden Rules
The most widely used tool for mobile, distributed and virtual teams is still the plain old telephone conference call. However it is also the most badly used! So whether you are talking over Skype, mixing it with screen sharing and messaging, using your corporate PABX or just calling in to an external service if you follow these 12 simple rules you will get much better calls.
